You are viewing noerobbins


It's a race Georgia barely lost additional than a month ago, but officials say they really should win big this summer inside the second leg in the competition.

"We just definitely feel extremely, incredibly confident that we're going to have a lot far better news this time around," said Bert Brantley, a spokesman for Gov. Sonny Perdue's office, referring to a next round in the federal Race for the Major funding. If approved for Georgia, it would also support Richmond County educational facilities.

Having to apply for a next round of funding has delayed the start on the state's reform plans by a couple of months, and its request for funding was lowered to a cap of $400 million.

Georgia's request inside primary phase was $462 million.

"We are inside method of reworking that budget," Brantley says. "It's unfortunate in that there will surely be less money to invest in these reforms, but it's not so very much that it is going to dilute it to where it won't have an impact."

Not everybody, although, is embracing the likelihood of the funding. On Wednesday, the Georgia Association of Educators held a news conference to denounce Georgia's Race for the Leading application, saying in part that its 43,000 members had been left out in the method of crafting proposed reforms.

"The GAE firmly believes that true reform for public education cannot occur without having collaboration at the talk about and local levels," according to some letter the GAE sent to U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan. "Instead of inclusion in the method to reform our public universities, the governor instead chose to exclude the voices of Georgia's educators belonging to professional education associations."

Brantley, although, mentioned the method involved input from about 20,000 teacher surveys.

"We got some incredibly clear direction," he said.

In March, Georgia finished third from the very first stage on the overall $4.35 billion competition, which is component from the Obama administration's efforts to reform education partly via enhancing the nation's lowest-performing universities.

The very first phase's best two winners were Delaware, which received $100 million, and Tennessee, which got $500 million.

The deadline for states to submit their plans for reform from the subsequent round is June 1, and Brantley explained officials hope to hear prior to next university year's start off which 15 or 16 states is going to be selected this time.

From the very first phase, the Richmond County school board voted to join Georgia's application for that federal funds as well as 23 other university districts. Brantley said Richmond County is going to be included automatically with Georgia's subsequent request.

Richmond County officials have says they aren't certain how a lot money they may obtain if Georgia is approved, but whatever the state receives, half is going to be divvied up among the local districts that applied along with the express. Columbia County didn't apply.

Richmond County officials say that a great deal on the planned reforms are already being undertaken or planned locally, including initiatives for subsequent school year at T.W. Josey, Glenn Hills and Lucy C. Laney high universities. Laney will likely be necessary to replace half of its staff.

South Carolina also plans to apply for that minute phase of Race towards the Best, after finishing sixth in the first round. Aiken County officials explained they could have received as very much as $6 million if their express had won a first-round grant.

South Carolina's funding request was reduced from $300 million in the initial round to $175 million.

"We know that from our round 1 scores -- from the fact that we ranked so highly -- that we're on the proper track," mentioned think Education Superintendent Jim Rex in a statement.

South Carolina officials have met with teachers, administrators, legislators and others to tweak their very first program because "our ambitions will have to be compatible with the amount of funding we're eligible to receive," Rex's statement says.

Georgia is keeping most of its prepare intact but has been working on reducing its reform spending budget.

"Our hope is we don't have to knock out anything," Brantley said. "Teacher bonuses in the merit pay (reform alternative) might not be as higher as what we had originally proposed," he mentioned of a prepare that would permit teachers to opt in to a bonus method based partly on student performance.

Brantley said that if Georgia receives second-phase funding, the income would be disbursed over a four-year period. Inside initial year, he explained the think would likely establish an Office of School Turnaround to focus on enhancing the state's lowest-performing schools. He says the point out also would desire to implement a statewide student details database program allowing educators to track student records as they move from 1 district to another.

View Source

 NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Career Training Corp.'s (CECO) first-quarter profit a lot more than doubled as the post-secondary training provider reported a 23% improve in its student population.

Career Training, which supplies degrees in company, culinary arts and health studies, also mentioned it received an early indication that its accrediting body may perhaps not sanction one of its schools. The college, American InterContinental University, has been under scrutiny since the federal government this winter expressed concern that the agency had given approval to one particular in the university's programs.

Job Education explained in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that an advisory team from the agency, the Higher Learning Commission from the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools, visited the campus in January and suggested it wouldn't issue any citations for violating accreditation criteria. The group mentioned it didn't suggest sanctions to full accrediting body, either. Job Education expects the final advisory report inside the next few weeks, but explained the complete commission isn't needed to follow its recommendations.

Meanwhile, Job Training reported first-quarter earnings of $55.2 million, or 66 cents a share, up from $23 million, or 26 cents a share, a year earlier. Revenue increased 22% to $529.6 million.

Analysts polled by Thomson Reuters were expecting earnings of 64 cents on revenue of $519 million.

Operating margin jumped to 16.6% from 11.8%.

New-student starts jumped one-third.

Shares of Profession Training were off 0.7% after hours at $29.78. The stock has risen 29% so far this year.

View Source

Bloomberg Blames Albany for Fiscal Woes



Don’t blame me, Mayor Michael Bloomberg mentioned on Thursday.

Blame Albany.

Figuratively shaking his finger due north, Bloomberg released a $62.9 billion finances proposal yesterday that would reduce the city's work force by nearly 11,000 folks -- practically 7,000 of them from the Department of Education. The mayor shirked responsibility for that cuts, and instead took out the city's fiscal woes on Albany, which he contends could cut $1.3 billion in municipal aid from the town.

"Make no mistake about it, unless the legislature acts New York Town residents will pay the price for Albany's bad decisions," stated Bloomberg, before delivering his annual PowerPoint presentation on the town budget. "And I will remind everybody who sadly might lose their jobs that it's because of Albany's fiscal irresponsibility for your last dozen years."

The state faces an approximately $9 billion deficit, and the legislature and governor have failed to reach an agreement on any prepare to deal with it. The state price range was supposed to be approved by April 1. It's now 36 days late with no agreement in sight.

The state's failure to act, said Bloomberg, clouds the city's fiscal future with so much uncertainty that his administration had no selection but to prepare to the worst. The city too faces a $5 billion spending plan hole, which the administration plans to close via cuts. His plan doesn't raise taxes.

It does propose to strip thousands of classrooms of teachers and close 20 fire corporations and 50 senior centers. The mayor promised to hold the Police Department harmless in light of last week's attempted bombing in Times Square.

View Source

The charter vs. union debate has emerged as the dominant theme in New York education policy debates.

In Wednesday’s Journal, education reporter Barbara Martinez takes us inside one college situated appropriate within the fault line in between charter advocates and the United Federation of Teachers: the unionized Renaissance Charter College. It is 1 of only 10 charters — out of 200 in the think — represented through the teachers’ union. According to Martinez’s report, nevertheless, a number of teachers and one particular co-principal at the school now blame union leaders for pushing state policies that have led to layoffs in the institution.

 “I feel like it’s a betrayal,” mentioned Maura Malarcher, one particular of the high school’s teachers and a member with the board. She mentioned she is “a pro-union individual,” but added that she was disappointed from the UFT mainly because she felt it advocated with the charter funding freeze.

 The talk about Legislature froze funding for charter schools to the 2009-10 school year at exactly the same per-pupil level as 2008-09. The freeze is likely to continue into the next school year. Charter advocates stated it cut revenue to charter educational facilities by $50 million across the express.

Check out this article source

 The UFT says it advocates for exactly the same type of funding for all colleges, and that charter-school funding was cut at a similar time that funding for other schools was cut.

The predicament within Renaissance is a microcosm in the general struggle in between the two sides to influence the state’s education spending priorities. Team Charter has succeeded in pushing a bill through the state Senate that would raise the cap on charter universities in New York to 460.

Charter enthusiasts are quick to suggest that New York’s strict limits on the number of such schools played a role within the state’s rejected application for millions in federal education aide under the Race towards Top program. New York plans to reapply with the federal funds by June 1.

The teacher’s union, about the other hand, opposes the bill passed by the Senate and questions the degree of transparency and accountability for charters, which take public resources but operate beyond the control of institution districts. At bottom, nonetheless, this scenario looks like a classic zero-sum game: the state’s budget woes mean there's less dollars to spend on education general, and every single public dollar that goes for the charters is 1 that does not go to conventional public universities.

So the union is moving to persuade the Assembly to block the Senate bill. Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver, who has by far the most manage more than legislation that passes the lower house on the point out legislature, was pointedly cool around the Senate bill: “It was printed in the middle of Friday night. It passed. The ink was still wet on it,” he told the New York Post. “When it dries, we’ll be able to read it.”

Now both charter boosters plus the union are are running dueling advertisements–as Martinez notes, every is trying to persuade the voting public that the other side is pushing self-interested policies. Neither side wanted to talk about how much they are spending for the media blitz. Let’s take a appear in the ads.

Initial, the pro-charter television spot sponsored from the Education Reform Now, a national non-profit group.

In classic political ad style, the pro-charter commercial gives one-line soundbites to a rainbow coalition of parents who express anger more than the loss on the Race towards the Best money. The culprits identified inside the ad? Albany as well as the teachers union.

The UFT has responded with a radio ad running this week throughout morning and afternoon rush hours, with an emphasis on five English-language and two Spanish stations in New York City. The complications raised in this ad–rising class sizes, after-school program cuts, teacher layoffs–are laid in the feet of “for-profit charter classes management organizations playing politics in Albany.”

The cream of corporate Quebec is pooling its help around McGill University and criticizing the provincial federal government in an increasingly bitter and public spat more than tuition costs.

Some of the best CEOs inside province, including Power Corp.’s André Desmarais and BMO Nesbitt Burns’s Jacques Ménard, signed an open letter reproaching Quebec’s Education Minister for her choice to punish the Montreal university over its tuition hike for MBA students.

The heavy hitters say Quebec’s Education Ministry, which opposes McGill’s massive charge hike by insisting all universities remain on equal footing, is encouraging mediocrity.

“We won’t construct the future of Quebec by asking universities to select in between excellence and access,” says the letter with 45 signatories.

The unusual public denunciation and collective show of help for McGill come from high-powered figures who also include former Parti Québécois premier Lucien Bouchard, former SNC-Lavalin chief Jacques Lamarre, and Gilbert Rozon, CEO and founder from the Just for Laughs Festival.

The dispute among the Charest Liberals and 1 of Canada’s top universities has reached a stalemate. McGill stated Thursday that it's forging ahead with its strategy to introduce a self-financing type for MBA students which will drive tuition charges to $29,500 this fall. Quebec students currently pay less than $1,700 a year, part of a fee structure that keeps the province’s tuition the lowest in Canada.

Education Minister Michelle Courchesne shows no sign of backing down, either. An aide reported Thursday that the minister is sticking to her strategy to claw back $28,000 per MBA student from McGill if the university refuses to abide by Quebec’s tuition rules. “There’s no exception that is usually produced for McGill,” explained the aide, Tamara Davis.

Paul Tellier, former CEO of Canadian National Railway Co. and Bombardier Inc., stated in an interview that Quebec’s position is “mind-boggling” and “shocking.”

“Name me a country where the objective is to put every institution of higher education on the same level,” said Mr. Tellier, who signed the letter. “We have the benefit of having, in McGill, 1 with the finest and most recognized universities in Canada. For that university being in Quebec can be a plus for Quebec, and for it to be penalized makes no sense whatsoever.”

Quebec’s position has been that low tuition charges support make sure access to increased education. Paradoxically, on the other hand, enrolment in Quebec is below the Canadian average.

Mr. Tellier explained the Quebec government is taking a lowest-common-denominator approach.

“The position being taken by the Minister of Education is totally unacceptable,” he said. “I know the Premier [Jean Charest] really well, and I just can’t believe that he might be supportive of doing some thing like this. I will be extremely surprised if he would be ready to penalize McGill for becoming a world-class university.”

McGill says it shifted to the new funding type at its Desautels Faculty of Management within the face of chronic provincial underfunding and due to the fact it was losing money on each MBA student. It expenses $22,000 annually to educate a McGill MBA student, whilst tuition and government funding come to about $12,000 annually.

The dean of Desautels, Peter Todd, reported Thursday that fall enrolment for the MBA program under the new, higher charge structure is about on par with previous years; scholarship funding, however, is up about tenfold, which was planned as part from the new financing style.

Check out this article source

How the Ivy League Might Reshape Education


Having already pondered the Ivy League exodus from comedy towards the White House, we try to dissect the direction Ivy League graduates may perhaps be going in with their degree in tow. A school’s reputation can certainly open some doors for graduates inside the real globe. But today’s biggest contributions from students pacing academia’s most-hallowed halls may well be towards the institution of education itself.

Some of that comes from the most-recent figures courtesy on the common (and some might say controversial) Educate for America Software. A system that places the country’s greatest and brightest in understaffed and underfunded colleges, Educate for America has seen a noticeable surge in applications from the Ivy League over the past few years. This year, an impressive 17 percent of Harvard’s graduating class has applied on the routine, the highest figure of any school in the country. Yale boasted a 16-percent figure with 13 percent of Brown’s 2010 class applying. While not all Ivy Leaguers have ultimately continued as teachers following completing Educate for America, the Ivy League does appear to be producing significant contributions to America’s lagging training system.

Recently, the Knowledge is Power plan, cited by the Obama administration soon after being founded by two Ivy Leaguers in a single Houston classroom, is the biggest charter school operator inside country, serving minority and poor children in almost 20 states. Sure, it’s surprising to see some Ivy Leaguers turning to high schools in a very globe that doesn’t necessarily fete them with job provides the way it applied to. But Ivy League education programs are also reshaping the way future schools might teach.

Last year, Harvard introduced a new Doctoral of Education Leadership program looking to “effect key changes in K-12 education.” This year, Harvard hosted an innovative convention to discuss digital teaching platforms in elementary, middle, and secondary training. All this, not to mention the Train for America surge, comes on the heels of current “reflection seminars” hunting to lead Harvard students as they approached the professional earth.

With Ivy Leaguers giving teaching a try in all corners on the globe, America’s most-heralded academic institutions are putting far greater emphasis on teaching in a realm where investigation has long been king. Needless to say, not everybody considers Ivy Leaguers qualified to show in some from the country’s most underserved universities. But in a earth in which teaching jobs are becoming increasingly attractive among America’s greatest and brightest, Ivy Leaguers are even looking for teaching jobs on CraigsList. Five years after Columbia and Yale graduate teaching assistants went on strike, those pursuing education could be the new huge men and women on campus.

View Source

Political gridlock in Sacramento threatens the Bay Area's economic system by undermining the educational system required to train a 21st century work force, says a survey being issued right now by the Bay Region Council Economic Institute.

The 70-page study analyzes the economic climate on the nine-county Bay Place and estimates where the region would rank in terms of gross domestic merchandise if it were a country - that may be, 25th, after Saudi Arabia and Norway but ahead of Austria and Taiwan.

The Council, a privately supported public policy group, will discuss the report currently with about 800 company and political leaders at its annual Outlook Conference in Santa Clara.

"We're very concerned with the impact on the economic climate since of what's happening to education simply because with the budget crisis in Sacramento," explained Sean Randolph in the council's Financial Institute.

The report notes some on the ways education cuts hurt the regional economy:

-- The declining top quality of lower education makes families reluctant to put their kids in public school, which affects quality of life.

-- College-level cuts make it harder for students to train for the best-paying jobs and diminish the regional talent pool important to an financial state based on innovation.

Randolph mentioned the state's inability to choose how significantly to cut spending, raise taxes or both to fund education as well as other services, like infrastructure, is really a issue not easily solved but impossible to ignore.

"We're not saying it's all gloom and doom," he added, as the record highlights the Bay Area's numerous strengths:

-- The region's 7 million people constitute just 2 percent with the U.S. population but account for 3 percent of its gross domestic product.

-- The Bay Location remains a world center for startups, attracting 20 percent of all global venture capital.

-- The Bay Place is home to 7 percent with the world's 500 largest firms as ranked by Fortune in 2009 and is second only to New York as a global headquarters.

But the survey suggests that the benefits of this economic might are unevenly distributed.

"The income gap among rich and poor has gone up since 2000 and is worse than other big U.S. cities," the statement said, citing San Jose and San Francisco as having the biggest gaps, ahead of Boston, Atlanta, New York, Seattle, San Diego, Austin, Los Angeles and Houston.

"This is really a trend that is pronounced in quite a lot each and every major metropolitan place and is especially pronounced here," Randolph stated.

The factors for this trend are complex, but he stated one important factor for that growing gap in between top and bottom has been the loss of higher-paying manufacturing jobs. A manufacturing exodus following the dot-com bust hit the Bay Place particularly difficult, and although the region is still strong in engineering, design along with other high-skill, high-pay occupations, former factory workers may well have been pushed into lower-paying service occupations.

"This has brought about a rather fundamental restructuring in the distribution of incomes around the region," he mentioned.

Article Source

When I blogged about the National Day to Prevent Teen Pregnancy last year, I talked about the substantial link between teen pregnancy rates and dropout costs. In one sentence, it goes like this:

 Teen pregnancy prevention can assist enhance graduation rates, since girls who get pregnant as teenagers are less likely to graduate from high college, and dropout prevention can be a form of teen pregnancy prevention, since girls who stay engaged in school and believe in their ability to attain their educational and career objectives are much less likely to obtain pregnant as teenagers.

Which is still true. But this year, two points are unique.

Primary, the bad news. The most recent data from the Guttmacher Institute suggest that for the 1st time in 14 years, teenage pregnancy prices went slightly up rather than down. All the additional critical that our nation’s teens get comprehensive, medically accurate, age-appropriate information about how to maintain from obtaining pregnant until after they have reached their educational objectives – as well as encouragement to set and function towards such objectives.

Second, the excellent news. Congress’s upcoming reauthorization from the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (commonly recognized as "No Child Left Behind") presents a great possibility to address the needs of pregnant and parenting students so they can stay in college and graduate prepared for postsecondary opportunities. Those for whom pregnancy prevention doesn't operate and who decide to carry their pregnancies to term really should not be deemed "failures" and discouraged or illegally discriminated against by their schools. For them, their kids, and our nation, it ought to not be seen as the end of their educational possibilities, but a new beginning. Congress and schools can't squander this chance to make a difference inside the lives of so quite a few.

Check out this article source